Journal of Geographical Sciences ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 794-822.doi: 10.1007/s11442-020-1756-1
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
DERDOURI Ahmed1, MURAYAMA Yuji2
Received:
2019-02-19
Accepted:
2019-09-09
Online:
2020-05-25
Published:
2020-07-25
About author:
Ahmed Derdouri, specialized in GIS and remote sensing. E-mail: ahmed.derdouri@gmail.com
DERDOURI Ahmed, MURAYAMA Yuji. A comparative study of land price estimation and mapping using regression kriging and machine learning algorithms across Fukushima prefecture, Japan[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(5): 794-822.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Table 1
Descriptive list of reviewed literature regarding land price estimation/mapping grouped by estimation approach: (1) hedonic models, (2) geostatistical methods, (3) machine learning algorithms, and (4) comparison of various approaches"
Estimation approach | Study | Study area | Method(s) | Mapping | Objective | Highlighted results | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hedonic models | ( | Canton Zurich, Switzerland | Hedonic regression | Yes | Developing an estimation model of rent and land prices | Two classified maps of land prices for residential and commercial uses | |
( | Seoul, South Korea | OLS and spatial regression models | No | Estimation of land value using OLS and generalized regression models | Spatial error model (SEM) found to be the best of the tested models | ||
( | C?te-d’Or, France | OLS | No | Estimation of the price of agricultural lands at cadastral levels based on previous real estate transactions | Hedonic prices were calculated based on a range of attributes influencing agricultural lands most notable time effects | ||
Geostatistical methods | ( | Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA | Kriging | No | Predicting urban land values of different land use categories using kriging models | Overall average standard error of 2% | |
( | City of Granada, Spain | Kriging and cokriging | Yes | Estimating and mapping housing prices using kriging and cokriging approaches | Cokriging has a lower standard error compared with that of kriging | ||
( | Tokyo 23 wards, Japan | Kriging | Yes | Mapping estimated land prices in Tokyo’s 23 wards from 1975 to 2004 | Kriging model-based results were more accurate than those for OLS with the average error ranging from 2% to 10% | ||
Geostatistical methods | ( | Tokyo metropolitan area, Japan | Regression kriging | Yes | Developing a system to estimate and map residential land price in the Tokyo metropolitan area | 10% was the average error ratio for the exponential model but 18.3% for the Gaussian model | |
( | Metropolitan area of Vienna, Austria | Kriging and cokriging | Yes | Mapping predicted real estate prices | Universal cokriging showed better results in terms of cross-validation results | ||
( | City of Grenada, Spain | Regression and universal cokriging | Yes | Spatiotemporally estimating housing price variations 1988-2005 | Regression cokriging was found to be slightly better | ||
( | Italy | Jackknife kriging | No | Predicting real estate prices based on socioeconomic factors for the period 2014-2016 | Accuracy of the model improved when considering the spatio-temporal correlation | ||
Machine learning algorithms | ( | A district of Tangshan city, China | Hybrid genetic algorithm and support vector machine model (G-SVM), Grey Model (GM) | No | Forecasting housing prices | G-SVM outperformed GM in many aspects | |
( | Saint Petersburg, Russia | Machine learning algorithms | No | Estimating residential apartments | Random forest was found to be the most robust among all methods | ||
( | Chongqing city, China | SVM optimized by particle swarm optimization (PSO), BP neural network | No | Forecasting real estate price based on PSO-optimized SVM compared to other BP neural network | PSO-SVM showed higher forecasting accuracy than BP neural network | ||
( | Fairfax County, Virginia, USA | Machine learning algorithms (C4.5, RIPPER, Na?ve Bayesian, and AdaBoost) | No | Prediction of housing prices using different machine learning methods | RIPPER model outperformed all selected methods | ||
Comparison of various approaches | ( | Jefferson County, Kentucky, USA | OLS, nearest neighbors, geostatistical and trend surface models | No | Comparing the outcomes of several methods estimating house prices | The geostatistical model showed better results in terms of prediction errors | |
( | Chennai metropolitan area, India | Multiple regression and neural network | No | Modeling and estimation of land prices based on economic and social factors | Neural network and multiple regression performed well with a slight superiority of the former | ||
( | Wuhan city, China | Empirical Bayesian kriging (EBK), GWR, OLS | Yes | Modeling and visualizing dependency of urban residential land price and the influential variables | Estimated coefficients of variables impacting land prices depend on the location based on GWR results which outperformed OLS | ||
( | Potsdam, Germany | Hedonic regression, kriging, and random forest | Yes | Comparing estimated rental prices by three methods and visualize the outcome | RF found to be the most accurate method |
Table 3
Summary of spatial prediction models used in this study: Linear, nonlinear, and regression trees models are grouped as proposed by Kuhn and Johnson (2013). Abbreviations are used to refer to each method in the manuscript"
Category | Model | Abbreviation | R package |
---|---|---|---|
Linear | Generalized linear model | GLM | base |
Generalized additive model using splines | GAMS | mgcv | |
Support vector machines with linear kernel | SVMLinear | kernlab | |
Nonlinear | Multivariate adaptive regression spline | MARS | earth |
k-nearest neighbors | kNN | base | |
Support vector machines with radial basis function kernel | SVMRadial | kernlab | |
Regression trees | Cubist | Cubist | Cubist |
Stochastic gradient boosting | GBM | gbm ( | |
Random forest | RF | randomForest ( |
Table 4
List of explanatory variables selected in this study with their data sources and the related abbreviations"
Explanatory variables | Data | GIS function | Variable description | Abbreviation |
---|---|---|---|---|
Distance to the nearest railway station (m) | Railway stations | Near | Calculated using the railway stations layer | Distance |
Area of rice fields [m2] | Land uses within a square kilometer | Spatial Join | The areas of different land-uses within one square kilometer classified according to the National Land Numerical Information | Paddy |
Area of other agricultural land (m2) | Agricultural | |||
Area of forests (m2) | Forests | |||
Area of uncultivated land (m2) | Uncultivated | |||
Area of roads (m2) | Roads | |||
Area of railways (m2) | Railways | |||
Area of other land uses (m2) | Other uses | |||
Area of water bodies (m2) | Water | |||
Area of seashore (m2) | Seashore | |||
Area of the surface of the sea (m2) | Sea | |||
Area of golf courses (m2) | Golf | |||
Dummy variable for urbanization promoting area | Promoted urbanization areas | Spatial Join | A dummy variable; if the point location falls inside the area, the variable value receives 1, else 0 | Promotion |
Population density (persons/km2) | Population | Spatial Join | Calculated using the population data of 2015 for every minor municipal district | Density |
Number of enterprises | Enterprises | Spatial Join | Statistical GIS data of 2015 for every minor municipal district | Enterprises |
Number of employees | Employees | Employees | ||
Elevation (m) | DEM | Extract Multi Values to Points | Elevation of the point location | Elevation |
Table 5
Overview of datasets used in the study, their sources, and the year of release"
Data layers | Source | Year |
---|---|---|
Land price observations (published and prefectural) | National Land Numerical Information | 2015 |
Railway stations | 2015 | |
Land uses within 1 km2 area and their areas | 2014 | |
Promoted urbanization areas | 2011 | |
Population of every minor municipal district | Statistics Bureau of Japan | 2015 |
Number of enterprises and employees of every minor municipal district | ||
DEM | USGS | - |
Table 6
Regression results with detailed explanatory variables and their estimated coefficients"
Variables | Unit | Coefficients’ estimate | |
---|---|---|---|
Intercept | - | 4.439 | *** |
Distance to the nearest railway station | m | -2.09 × 10-5 | *** |
Population density | persons/km2 | 3.104 × 10-5 | *** |
Area of rice fields | m2 | -3.935 × 10-7 | *** |
Area of other agricultural land | m2 | -4.731 × 10-7 | *** |
Area of forests | m2 | -2.733 × 10-7 | *** |
Area of uncultivated land | m2 | -7.437 × 10-7 | . |
Area of roads | m2 | 7.211 × 10-7 | ** |
Area of railways | m2 | -3.301 × 10-8 | |
Area of other land uses | m2 | -8.97 × 10-8 | |
Area of water bodies | m2 | -3.086 × 10-7 | *** |
Area of seashore | m2 | -1.922 × 10-6 | |
Area of the surface of the sea | m2 | -1.25 × 10-7 | |
Area of golf courses | m2 | -5.843 × 10-8 | |
Dummy variable for urbanization promoting area | - | 1.819 × 10-1 | *** |
Elevation | m | -1.556 × 10-4 | ** |
Number of enterprises | - | 3.363 × 10-4 | ** |
Number of employees | - | -2.951 × 10-5 | * |
Number of samples = 1092; residual standard error = 0.1683, multiple R2 = 0.7408, adjusted R2 = 0.7349; F-statistic = 125.7, p-value = < 2.2 × 10-16 *** = sign. at 1% level ** = sign. at 5% level |
Figure 6
The results of the regression kriging for the year 2015 using the exponential model (upper), Gaussian model (middle), and spherical model (lower). On the left are the estimated log-transformed land prices using regression kriging. On the right are the validation errors in the training samples. Capital letters denote major cities within Fukushima prefecture, which are A: Fukushima, B: Koriyama, C: Iwaki, D: Aizuwakamtsu, and E: Shirakawa"
Table 8
Prediction errors and accuracy of machine learning methods"
Method | 10-fold cross-validation | Testing samples | Difference | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAE (%) | RMSE (%) | R2CV (%) | R2test (%) | R2CV (%) - R2test (%) | ||
Linear | GLM | 13.50 | 17.29 | 72.47 | 59.94 | +12.53 |
GAMS | 12.03 | 15.37 | 78.13 | 68.72 | +9.41 | |
SVMLinear | 13.38 | 17.25 | 72.73 | 59.12 | +13.61 | |
Nonlinear | MARS | 12.11 | 15.52 | 77.90 | 70.78 | +7.12 |
kNN | 13.38 | 17.35 | 72.24 | 68.03 | +4.21 | |
SVMRadial | 12.55 | 16.27 | 75.53 | 70.02 | +5.51 | |
Regression tree | Cubist | 12.19 | 15.60 | 77.72 | 72.74 | +4.98 |
GBM | 12.16 | 15.68 | 77.40 | 70.83 | +6.57 | |
RF | 11.39 | 14.97 | 79.17 | 77.68 | +1.49 |
Figure 9
Observed land prices vs. predicted land prices for the year 2015 in the testing samples by different machine learning methods (ordered from left to right, up to down): (1) GLM: generalized linear model, (2) GAMS: generalized linear model using splines, (3) SVMLinear: support vector machines with linear kernel, (4) MARS: multivariate adaptive regression spline, (5) kNN: k-nearest neighbors, (6) SVMRadial: support vector machines with radial basis function kernel, (7) Cubist, (8) GBM: stochastic gradient boosting and (9) RF: random forest"
Figure 10
Land price maps for the year 2015 predicted from officially published land price observations using machine learning algorithms (ordered from left to right, up to down): (1) GLM: generalized linear model, (2) GAMS: generalized linear model using splines, (3) SVMLinear: support vector machines with linear kernel, (4) MARS: multivariate adaptive regression spline, (5) kNN: k-nearest neighbors, (6) SVMRadial: support vector machines with radial basis function kernel, (7) Cubist, (8) GBM: stochastic gradient boosting and (9) RF: random forest"
Figure 11
Maps of differences in the 2015 land prices between the best-performing machine learning algorithms: (1) RF: Random Forest, (2) Cubist, (3) MARS: Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline and (4) GAMS: Generalized Linear Model using Splines and kriging exponential model. A1, A2, A3, and A4 show zoomed-in maps of Koriyama city and its outskirts"
[1] | Adegoke O J , 2014. Critical factors determining rental value of residential property in Ibadan metropolis, Nigeria. Property Management, 32(3):224-240. doi: 10.1108/PM-05-2013-0033. |
[2] | Antipov E A, Pokryshevskaya E B , 2012. Mass appraisal of residential apartments: An application of random forest for valuation and a CART-based approach for model diagnostics. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(2):1772-1778. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.077. |
[3] | Arnott R J, Lewis F D , 1979. The transition of land to urban use. Journal of Political Economy, 87(1):161-169. doi: 10.1086/260744. |
[4] | Bourassa S, Cantoni E, Hoesli M , 2010. Predicting house prices with spatial dependence: A comparison of alternative methods. Journal of Real Estate Research, 32(2):139-159. doi: 10.5555/rees.32.2.l15423724383157x. |
[5] | Breiman L , 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1):5-32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324. |
[6] | Brunsdon C, Fotheringham S, Charlton M , 1998. Geographically weighted regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 47(3):431-443. doi: 10.1111/1467-9884.00145. |
[7] | Caplin A, Chopra S, Leahy J V et al., 2008. Machine learning and the spatial structure of house prices and housing returns. ID 1316046, SSRN Scholarly Paper, 14 December. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1316046 (accessed 8 February 2019). |
[8] |
Capozza D R, Helsley R W , 1989. The fundamentals of land prices and urban growth. Journal of Urban Economics, 26(3):295-306. doi: 10.1016/0094-1190(89)90003-X.
doi: 10.1016/0094-1190(89)90003-X |
[9] | Capozza D R, Helsley R W, Mills E S , 1986. Urban growth and the price of land[D]. University of British Columbia, Faculty of Commerce and Business Administration. |
[10] | Cellmer R, Belej M Zrobek S et al., 2014. Urban land value maps: A methodological approach. Geodetski Vestnik, 58(3):535-551. doi: 10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2014.03.535-551. |
[11] | Chica-Olmo J , 2007. Prediction of housing location price by a multivariate spatial method: Cokriging. Journal of Real Estate Research, 29(1):91-114. doi: 10.5555/rees.29.1.06254n3806648g9w. |
[12] | Chica-Olmo J, Cano-Guervos R, Chica-Rivas M , 2019. Estimation of housing price variations using spatio-temporal data. Sustainability, 11(6):1551. doi: 10.3390/su11061551. |
[13] | Clapp J M, Nanda A, Ross S L , 2008. Which school attributes matter? The influence of school district performance and demographic composition on property values. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(2):451-466. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2007.03.004. |
[14] | Crespo R, Grêt-Regamey A , 2013. Local hedonic house-price modelling for urban planners: Advantages of using local regression techniques. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 40(4):664-682. doi: 10.1068/b38093. |
[15] | Derdouri A, Murayama Y , 2018. Onshore wind farm suitability analysis using GIS-based analytic hierarchy process: A case study of Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. Geoinformatics & Geostatistics: An Overview. doi: 10.4172/2327-4581.S3-005. |
[16] | Espey M, Owusu-Edusei K , 2001. Neighborhood parks and residential property values in Greenville, South Carolina. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 33(3):487-492. doi: 10.1017/S1074070800020952. |
[17] | Gu J, Zhu M, Jiang L , 2011. Housing price forecasting based on genetic algorithm and support vector machine. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4):3383-3386. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.123. |
[18] | Harris P, Charlton M, Fotheringham A S , 2010. Moving window kriging with geographically weighted variograms. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 24(8):1193-1209. doi: 10.1007/s00477-010-0391-2. |
[19] |
Hengl T , 2009. A Practical Guide to Geostatistical Mapping. Hengl.
doi: 10.1186/s12942-016-0064-6 pmid: 27776514 |
[20] | Hengl T, Heuvelink G B M, Rossiter D G , 2007. About regression-kriging: From equations to case studies. . Computers & Geosciences, 33(10) Spatial Analysis:1301-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2007.05.001. |
[21] |
Hilal M, Martin E, Piguet V , 2016. Prediction of the purchase cost of agricultural land: The example of Côte-d’Or, France. Land Use Policy, 52:464-476. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.01.005.
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.01.005 |
[22] | Hu S, Yang S, Li W et al., 2016. Spatially non-stationary relationships between urban residential land price and impact factors in Wuhan city, China. Applied Geography, 68:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.01.006. |
[23] | Inoue R, Kigoshi N, Shimizu E , 2007. Visualization of spatial distribution and temporal change of land prices for residential use in Tokyo 23 wards using spatio-temporal kriging. In: Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, 2007, 1-11. |
[24] | Kanasugi H, Ushijima K , 2018. The impact of a high‐speed railway on residential land prices. Papers in Regional Science, 97(4):1305-1335. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12293. |
[25] | Kawaguchi D, Yukutake N , 2017. Estimating the residential land damage of the Fukushima nuclear accident. Journal of Urban Economics, 99:148-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2017.02.005. |
[26] | Kiel K A, Zabel J E , 2008. Location, location, location: The 3L Approach to house price determination. Journal of Housing Economics, 17(2):175-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jhe.2007.12.002. |
[27] |
Kim B, Kim T , 2016. A study on estimation of land value using spatial statistics: Focusing on real transaction land prices in Korea. Sustainability, 8(3):203. doi: 10.3390/su8030203.
doi: 10.3390/su8030203 |
[28] |
Kok N, Monkkonen P, Quigley J M , 2014. Land use regulations and the value of land and housing: An intra-metropolitan analysis. Journal of Urban Economics, 81:136-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2014.03.004.
doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2014.03.004 |
[29] | Krige D G , 1951. A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 52(6):119-139. |
[30] | Kuhn M , 2008. Building predictive models in R using the caret package. Journal of Statistical Software, 28(1):1-26. doi: 10.18637/jss.v028.i05. |
[31] | Kuhn M, Johnson K , 2013. Applied Predictive Modeling. New York: Springer-Verlag. Available at: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9781461468486 (accessed 8 February 2019). |
[32] | Kuntz M, Helbich M , 2014. Geostatistical mapping of real estate prices: An empirical comparison of kriging and cokriging. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28(9):1904-1921. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2014.906041. |
[33] | Liu Y, Zheng B, Huang L et al., 2007. Urban residential land value analysis: Case Danyang, China. Geo-spatial Information Science, 10(3):228-234. doi: 10.1007/s11806-007-0066-4. |
[34] |
Löchl M , 2006. Real estate and land price models for the Greater Zurich application of UrbanSim. Working Paper. ETH, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, IVT, Institut für Verkehrsplanung und Transportsysteme. Available at: https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/23502?show=full (accessed 8 February 2019).
pmid: 12233488 |
[35] | Luo J, Wei Y D , 2004. A geostatistical modeling of urban land values in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Geographic Information Sciences, 10(1):49-57. doi: 10.1080/10824000409480654. |
[36] | Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIAC), 2016. Statistical Handbook of Japan. Statistics Bureau Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications Japan. Available at:http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/ handbook/pdf/ 2016all.pdf (accessed 23 December 2017) . |
[37] | Mostafa M M , 2018. A spatial econometric analysis of residential land prices in Kuwait. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 5(1):290-311. doi: 10.1080/21681376.2018.1518154. |
[38] | Murakami J , 2018. The Government Land Sales programme and developers’ willingness to pay for accessibility in Singapore, 1990-2015. Land Use Policy, 75:292-302. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.050. |
[39] | Nishimura Y, Oikawa M , 2017. The effect of nuclear accidents on land prices: Evidence from Fukushima-Daiichi in Japan. ID 3057221, SSRN Scholarly Paper, 23 October. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3057221 (accessed 18 June 2019). |
[40] | Palma M, Cappello C, De Iaco S , et al., 2019. The residential real estate market in Italy: A spatio-temporal analysis. Quality & Quantity, 53(4):2451-2472. doi: 10.1007/s11135-018-0768-8. |
[41] | Park B, Bae J K , 2015. Using machine learning algorithms for housing price prediction: The case of Fairfax County, Virginia housing data. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6):2928-2934. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa. 2014.11.040. |
[42] | Pebesma E J , 2004. Multivariable geostatistics in S: The gstat package. Computers & Geosciences, 30(7):683-691. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.012. |
[43] | Ratle F, Pozdnoukhov A, Demyanov V et al., 2010. Spatial data analysis and mapping using machine learning algorithms. In: Advanced Mapping of Environmental Data. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 95-148. doi: 10.1002/9780470611463.ch4. |
[44] | Ridgeway G , 2005 Generalized boosted models: A guide to the gbm package. In:2005. |
[45] | Sampathkumar V, Santhi M H, Vanjinathan J , 2015 Forecasting the land price using statistical and neural network software. 3rd International Conference on Recent Trends in Computing, 57. 3rd International Conference on Recent Trends in Computing 2015 (ICRTC-2015):112-121. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.377. |
[46] | Sasaki M, Yamamoto K , 2018. Hedonic price function for residential area focusing on the reasons for residential preferences in Japanese metropolitan areas. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 11(3):39. doi: 10.3390/jrfm11030039. |
[47] | Schernthanner H, Asche H, Gonschorek J et al., 2016. Spatial modeling and geovisualization of rental prices for real estate portals. In: Gervasi O, Murgante B, Misra S et al. (eds.), Computational Science and Its Applications - ICCSA 2016, 120-133. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing. |
[48] | Shimizu C, Diewert W E, Nishimura K G et al., 2015. Estimating quality adjusted commercial property price indexes using Japanese REIT data. Journal of Property Research, 32(3):217-239. doi: 10.1080/09599916. 2015.1059875. |
[49] |
Shimizu C, Nishimura K G , 2007. Pricing structure in Tokyo metropolitan land markets and its structural changes: Pre-bubble, bubble, and post-bubble periods. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 35(4):475-496. doi: 10.1007/s11146-007-9052-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11146-007-9052-8 |
[50] | Szymanowski M, Kryza M, Spallek W , 2013. Regression-based air temperature spatial prediction models: An example from Poland. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 577-585. doi: 10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0440. |
[51] | Tanaka K, Managi S , 2016. Impact of a disaster on land price: Evidence from Fukushima nuclear power plant accident. The Singapore Economic Review, 61(1):1640003. doi: 10.1142/S0217590816400038. |
[52] |
Tegou L-I, Polatidis H, Haralambopoulos D A , 2010. Environmental management framework for wind farm siting: Methodology and case study. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(11):2134-2147. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.05.010.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.05.010 pmid: 20541310 |
[53] |
Tobler W R , 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46(Suppl.1):234-240. doi: 10.2307/143141.
doi: 10.2307/143141 |
[54] |
Tsujikawa N, Tsuchida S, Shiotani T , 2016. Changes in the factors influencing public acceptance of nuclear power generation in Japan since the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. Risk Analysis, 36(1):98-113. doi: 10.1111/risa.12447.
doi: 10.1111/risa.12447 pmid: 26224041 |
[55] | Tsutsumi M, Shimada A, Murakami D , 2011. Land price maps of Tokyo Metropolitan Area. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 21. International Conference: Spatial Thinking and Geographic Information Sciences 2011: 193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.046. |
[56] | Wang Q, M’Ikiugu M M, Kinoshita I et al., 2016. GIS-based approach for municipal renewable energy planning to support post-earthquake revitalization: A Japanese case study. Sustainability, 8(7):703. doi: 10.3390/su8070703. |
[57] | Wang X, Wen J, Zhang Y et al.Zhang Y , 2014. Real estate price forecasting based on SVM optimized by PSO. Optik, 125(3):1439-1443. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.09.017. |
[58] | Wen H, Goodman A C , 2013. Relationship between urban land price and housing price: Evidence from 21 provincial capitals in China. Habitat International, 40:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.01.004. |
[59] |
Wen H, Chu L, Zhang J et al., 2018. Competitive intensity, developer expectation, and land price: Evidence from Hangzhou, China. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 144(4):04018040. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000490.
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000477 pmid: 30906108 |
[60] |
Yamane F, Ohgaki H, Asano K , 2013. The immediate impact of the Fukushima Daiichi accident on local property values. Risk Analysis, 33(11):2023-2040. doi: 10.1111/risa.12045.
doi: 10.1111/risa.12045 pmid: 23557167 |
[61] |
Zhuang X, Zhao S , 2014. Effects of land and building usage on population, land price and passengers in station areas: A case study in Fukuoka, Japan. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3(2):199-212. doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2014.01.004.
doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2014.01.004 |
[1] | TANG Zhipeng, MEI Ziao, LIU Weidong, XIA Yan. Identification of the key factors affecting Chinese carbon intensity and their historical trends using random forest algorithm [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(5): 743-756. |
[2] | Guofeng ZHU, Hanxiong PAN, Yu ZHANG, Huiwen GUO, Leilei YONG, Qiaozhuo WAN, Huiying MA, Sen LI. Relative soil moisture in China’s farmland [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019, 29(3): 334-350. |
[3] | Shaojian WANG, Jieyu WANG, Yang WANG. Effect of land prices on the spatial differentiation of housing prices: Evidence from cross-county analyses in China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018, 28(6): 725-740. |
[4] | Yang LIU, Zongwei MA, Jianshu LV, Jun BI. Identifying sources and hazardous risks of heavy metals in topsoils of rapidly urbanizing East China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016, 26(6): 735-749. |
[5] | Yifu WANG, Tianxiang *YUE, Yuancai LEI, Zhengping DU, Mingwei ZHAO. Uncertainty of forest biomass carbon patterns simulation on provincial scale: A case study in Jiangxi Province, China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016, 26(5): 568-584. |
[6] | YAN Ziqi, XIA Jun, Lars GOTTSCHALK. Mapping runoff based on hydro-stochastic approach for the Huaihe River Basin, China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2011, 21(3): 441-457. |
[7] | GUAN Dongjie, GAO Weijun, WATARI Kazuyuki, FUKAHORI Hidetoshi. Land use change of Kitakyushu based on landscape ecology and Markov model [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2008, 18(4): 455-468. |
[8] | SULTAN Danyar, SONG Yudong, MARINA Jumakeld. Influence of groundwater level change on vegetation coverage and their spatial variation in arid regions [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2004, 14(3): 323-329. |